Overview and Architectural Evolution Landscape
We transition from the foundational success of AlexNet to the era of ultra-deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). This shift necessitated profound architectural innovations to handle extreme depth while maintaining training stability. We will analyze three seminal architectures—VGG, GoogLeNet (Inception), and ResNet—understanding how each solved different aspects of the scaling problem, laying the groundwork for rigorous model interpretability later in this lesson.
1. Structural Simplicity: VGG
VGG introduced the paradigm of maximizing depth using extremely uniform and small kernel sizes (exclusively 3x3 convolutional filters stacked). While computationally expensive, its structural uniformity proved that raw depth, achieved through minimal architectural variation, was a primary driver of performance gains, solidifying the importance of small receptive fields.
2. Computational Efficiency: GoogLeNet (Inception)
GoogLeNet countered VGG's high computational cost by prioritizing efficiency and multi-scale feature extraction. The core innovation is the Inception Module, which performs parallel convolutions (1x1, 3x3, 5x5) and pooling. Critically, it utilizes 1x1 convolutions as bottlenecks to dramatically reduce the parameter count and computational complexity before expensive operations.
The skip connection introduces an identity term ($+x$) into the output, creating an additive term in the derivative path ($\frac{\partial Loss}{\partial H} = \frac{\partial Loss}{\partial F} + 1$). This term ensures a direct path for the gradient signal to flow backwards, guaranteeing that the upstream weights receive a non-zero, usable gradient signal, regardless of how small the gradients through the residual function $F(x)$ become.